Machining Centre Productivity Up 5-Fold Due to Automation and Operating Costs Much Lower

“On this basis, overall production output is about five times that of one of our 40-taper machines. Additionally, the latter capacity needs the full-time attendance of an operator whereas the Brother cell occupies an operator for only about 20 percent of the person’s time. So there is a five-fold reduction in the labour cost content of components produced.”

He explained that the plug-and-play Speedio / Feedio cell costs about £800 per week to run including finance, labour and power, which he said “is not very much”. It arrived on the shop floor in March 2022 and, as already observed, produces similar output to five 40-taper machines with full-time operators. That is why Mr Cobb describes the benefits of his first ever automated prismatic component production cell as “absolutely astronomical” and “off the charts”.

What makes automation feasible for small batches of relatively uncomplicated components requiring short cycle times is rapid cell changeover within two hours, including swapping the cutting program and tools. It is largely down to Brother’s easy-to-use ChipLite conversational software that controls the handling robot and camera vision system.

All that is needed is to key in via a touchscreen GUI the size of the new raw billet, the spacing on the conveyors and the gripper finger data. Connection of the robot program, generated by the dedicated on-board PC, to the VMC control system is via a Profibus link. Mr Cobb asserts that changing over a conventional robot-loaded machining centre and reprogramming it would take days rather than hours.

There are other makes of 5-axis VMC in the Stapleford factory, all 40-taper models. The Brother M200X3, with its 300 x 440 x 305 mm working volume and 16,000 rpm face-and-taper contact spindle, is the first 30-taper 5-axis machine on-site, the other eight Speedios being 4-axis models with a rotary indexer.

The effect of having an additional CNC axis on the M200X3 and using the machine in 3+2 or 4+1 positional mode is to deskill machine operation. It also reduces fixturing costs and balances more closely the machine’s cutting cycles with the time required for performing a second operation manually on another machine to finish the sixth face of components.

What tends to happen in practice in Stapleford is that foreman Rob Sinclair sets up the Speedio / Feedio cell when he arrives on Monday morning. It then runs for typically two days non-stop, virtually unattended, before it needs to be reset. It is the inexorability of component loading and unloading without any stoppages that Mr Cobb says underpins the cell’s very high efficiency and production output.

He also advised that every night shift in particular is much more productive with the automation, as all the operator needs to do is attend to swarf clearance, tool exchange and perhaps coolant supply. He or she is therefore free to complete other duties on the shop floor with very little interruption.

As to his choice of automated handling of the component itself, rather than a machine pallet with a component fixtured, Mr Cobb points to the couple of hundred different jobs routinely passing through his factory that are able to benefit from automation. They would need expensive pallets and bespoke jigs and fixtures, a production route that would not be economical. Furthermore, the footprint of such pallet change systems tends to be large.

It is interesting that in 2014 when Hemlock Engineering, 90 percent of whose production involves machining aluminium, took the policy decision to migrate from 40-taper to faster 30-taper machines, the subcontractor gained the productivity boost that it was seeking due to cycle times that proved to be between 50 and 70 percent quicker than previously. However, what was not foreseen was that the Speedio machines would be so fast that one operator was committed full-time to each, so there was no labour cost advantage. It is exactly this problem that robotic loading and unloading solves.